MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966823632 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450820119

Simultaneous Drying and Cleaning of Guava Seeds in a Spout‐Fluid Bed with Draft Tube

2004· article· en· W1966823632 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guillermo Osorio‐Revilla, T. López‐Suárez, Tzayhrí Gallardo‐Velázquez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Surface Properties and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDraft tubeAir velocityTube (container)Volumetric flow rateInletPulp (tooth)Materials sciencePulp and paper industryAir temperatureComposite materialChromatographyMechanicsEnvironmental scienceChemistryMechanical engineeringMeteorologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A half sectional spout‐fluid bed column with draft tube was used for the cleaning and drying of guava seeds in one single operation. The process took place on a batch basis with a constant spouting velocity of 1.5 Ums and an additional annular air flow rate equivalent to 0.5 and 0.7 Umf. A regression model based on the spouting air temperature Ts, the annular inlet air temperature Ta and the additional annular air flow rate xUmf was obtained to calculate the drying time. An additional cleaning step was necessary to increase the separation efficiency of the dried pulp from about 70% obtained during the drying process to 84%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207