Model-Based Construction of Calcium Sulfate Phase-Transition Diagrams in the HCl−CaCl<sub>2</sub>−H<sub>2</sub>O System between 0 and 100 °C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phase-transition diagrams of three CaSO 4 phases, namely, dihydrate, hemihydrate, and anhydrate, in the HCl−CaCl 2 −H 2 O system are successfully constructed making use of a recently developed OLI-based chemical model. After initial validation of the model by comparison to experimentally determined CaSO 4 phase-transition points in H 2 O or pure HCl solutions, the phase-transition border between dihydrate and anhydrite and that between dihydrate and hemihydrate was obtained by calculating the solution supersaturation (or scaling tendency according to OLI). The constructed phase-transition diagrams show three main regions, namely, regions I, II, and III. In region I, dihydrate is stable, while anhydrite is stable in regions II and III. Dihydrate is metastable in region II, while hemihydrate is metastable in region III. An increase in HCl and/or CaCl 2 concentration causes the metastable region of HH to expand at the expense of DH. This has the result of lowering the corresponding transition temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".