Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’invention de la photographie a changé de manière radicale la façon d’étudier la physionomie humaine. En se substituant aux moyens de représentation traditionnels, la chambre noire introduit, dès la seconde moitié du xixe siècle, un nouveau protocole d’analyse physiognomonique fondé sur la croyance en l’infaillibilité de la plaque photosensible. Cette croyance est le fondement même de ce que Charles Grivel nomme le « lavatérisme généralisé » de l’époque. De Duchenne de Boulogne à Alphonse Bertillon, en passant par le travail fondateur de Cesare Lombroso, la chambre noire apparaît dans l’imaginaire visuel collectif comme le médium qui, par excellence, est à même de fixer et de restituer l’image des types sociaux. En prenant comme cas d’étude « Le Horla » (1886), cette contribution vise à retracer les liens entre le chef-d’oeuvre de Guy de Maupassant et l’iconographie photographique issue de cette vague néo-lavatérienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".