MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966871665 · doi:10.1145/1971706.1971715

HealthAchieve 2010

2011· article· en· W1966871665 on OpenAlex
D. J. Padamadan, Tom Closson, Joseph Gabriele, Janice Latam, G Pino

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGHIT Record · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityOntario Medical AssociationCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDelegateGeneral partnershipPromotion (chess)DecentralizationPublic relationsHealthcare deliveryBest practiceHealth careEvent (particle physics)BusinessQuality (philosophy)Knowledge managementPolitical scienceMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we summarize the HealthAchieve 2010 event held November 8 th -10 th in Toronto, Canada. HealthAchieve is considered the definitive Canadian healthcare delivery experience conference. The insights garnered among attending delegates serves to expand the existing knowledge base and promote the need for research in healthcare to address respective enterprise gap deficiencies in delivery and quality. HealthAchieve 2010, illuminated delegate awareness to decentralization trends; health promotion and wellbeing initiatives; optimal delivery approaches; chronic disease management, primary prevention, evidence-based best practices; and fundraising strategies. The conference encouraged learning, relationship building, knowledge sharing, and the strengthening of existing partnerships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it