MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966929704 · doi:10.1002/jcc.10270

Alcohols, ethers, carbohydrates, and related compounds. III. The 1,2‐dimethoxyethane system

2003· article· en· W1966929704 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jenn‐Huei Lii, Kuohsiang Chen, T. Bruce Grindley, Norman L. Allinger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsDimethoxyethaneChemistryDimethyl etherEthylene glycolAb initioHydrogen bondComputational chemistryEtherAb initio quantum chemistry methodsStandard enthalpy of formationHydrogenMolecular geometryPhysical chemistryBond lengthMoleculeElectrolyteOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethylene glycol, its dimethyl ether, and some related compounds have been studied using the MM4 molecular mechanics force field. The MM4 calculated structural and energetic results have been brought into satisfactory agreement with a considerable number of experimental data and MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) ab initio calculations. The heats of formation of these compounds are also well calculated. The MM4 ethylene glycol conformations in particular are in good agreement, both geometrically and in terms of energy, with those from the ab initio calculations. The corresponding dimethyl ether is of special interest, because it has been suggested that the trans-gauche conformation is unusually stable due to the hydrogen bonding of a hydrogen on a methyl group with the more distant oxygen. It is shown in the present work that while this conformation is more stable than might have been expected, the energy is adequately calculated by MM4 without using any hydrogen bonding between the Cbond;H bond and the oxygen. If such hydrogen bonding occurs, it amounts to no more than about 0.5 kcal/mol in energy, and is too small to detect with certainty. Additionally, energetic relationships in trans-1,2-dimethoxycyclohexane, 1,3,5,7-tetraoxadecalin, and 3-methoxytetrahydropyran have been studied, and the calculated results are compared with experimental information, which is adequately reproduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational ChemistrySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207