MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966939403 · doi:10.1177/1045389x05050105

Actuator Placement Optimization and Adaptive Vibration Control of Plate Smart Structures

2005· article· en· W1966939403 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorControllabilityVibration controlControl theory (sociology)Active vibration controlVibrationFinite element methodEngineeringGenetic algorithmOptimization problemControl engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringMathematicsControl (management)AcousticsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a performance criterion is proposed for the optimization of piezoelectric patch actuator locations on flexible plate structures based on maximizing the controllability grammian. This is followed by the determination of parameters required for actuator location optimization through Structuring Analysis in ANSYS Finite Element Analysis Package. Genetic Algorithm is then used to implement the optimization. Finally, with the actuators bonded on optimized locations, a filtered-x LMS-based multichannel adaptive control is applied to suppress vibration response of the plate. Numerical simulations are performed in suppressing tri-sinusoidal response at three points of the plates. The results show that the developed actuator placement optimization methodology is very effective in searching for the optimal actuator locations that minimize the energy requirement of vibration control. The control algorithm is also demonstrated to be efficient and robust in the smart structure vibration control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it