MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966942799 · doi:10.5539/jas.v3n1p228

The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Iranian Olive Industrial Cluster

2011· article· en· W1966942799 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jafar Azizi, T Aref Eshghi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Capital and Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial capitalBusinessInformation and Communications TechnologyCluster (spacecraft)Diseconomies of scaleCompetition (biology)Industrial organizationScale (ratio)Capital (architecture)MarketingEconomies of scaleComputer scienceGeographyPolitical scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cluster development method is one of the successful developing methods in agricultural industries sectionand small industries, which is based on communication and creation cooperation network between clusterbeneficiaries by increasing the social capital. In this research the data were collected by using census two stagesurvey from olive industrial units in mentioned geographical zone(North Iran) in 2007. The results of thisresearch showed that the social capital in some of beneficiaries groups is weak and brittle, but because of theirstatements there is background of cooperation and increase of their social capital. After recognition andstrengthening the effective factors on increase of social capital, can prepare the background for developing ofnew connective and informative technologies. Naturally economic discompetition of units, diseconomies of scale,negative competition in industry and the other problems which are investigated in the olive industrial cluster isresulting from the lack of information and connection between cluster actives. The aim of industrial clustermethod is increasing the cooperation network between cluster members by increasing the communication andinformation which by increase in using information and communication technology will fallow social capital andthen industrial cluster development method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicSocial Capital and NetworksFrench-language works237,207