Diagnosis and management of primary hyperparathyroidism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
#### Summary points Primary hyperparathyroidism is the most common cause of hypercalcaemia in the ambulatory setting.1 2 Although this condition can occur at any age, it commonly affects people over the age of 50 years and postmenopausal women.2 3 Over the past few decades it has changed from being a condition usually defined by its symptoms to one that is often discovered on routine screening tests while the patient is still largely asymptomatic. In light of advances in research, new guidelines on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism have recently been developed. We review the presentation, diagnosis, and management of primary hyperparathyroidism for the generalist doctor, with evidence drawn from randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and the most recent consensus guidelines. #### Sources and selection criteria We searched Medline from 2002 to 2011 using the terms “primary hyperparathyroidism”, “diagnosis”, and “management of primary hyperparathyroidism”. We reviewed all relevant articles as well as the proceedings from …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".