MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966967960 · doi:10.1109/pes.2006.1708938

Research activities on the environmental impact of AC and DC power transmission systems

2006· article· en· W1966967960 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Sarma Maruvada

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric power transmissionElectrical engineeringPower transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)VoltageTransmission systemPower (physics)EngineeringTelecommunicationsEnvironmental sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The panelist speaks about the extensive research carried out by Canadian utilities on the corona and environmental performance ac transmission lines, particularly at 500 kV and 735 kV. Research activities were also pursued to evaluate the technical feasibility of ac transmission at even higher voltages, up to 1500 kV. Significant efforts were devoted in Canada to the investigation of power frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF) and their possible impact on human health. Extensive research was also carried out at the National Research Council of Canada as well as at utility research centers in Canada for the design of HVDC transmission lines in the range of plusmn 400 kV to plusmn 500 kV and for evaluating the technical feasibility of transmission at voltages in the range of plusmn 600 kV to plusmn 1200 kV

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingSame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207