Physiological Implications of the Contrasting Modulation of the Activities of the ε- and ζ-Isoforms of Diacylglycerol Kinase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have shown that the requirement of the epsilon-isoform of diacylglycerol kinase for diacylglycerols containing arachidonic acid is specific for this substrate and cannot be replaced by the presence of an arachidonoyl group in other places in the membrane; rather, it has to be present on the substrate itself. In addition, we demonstrate that the increased activity shown toward 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoylglycerol by the epsilon-isoform of diacylglycerol kinase is not a consequence of altered membrane physical properties but is rather a specific interaction with the arachidonoyl group. We have also compared the modulation of the activity of the epsilon-isoform of diacylglycerol kinase with that of the zeta-isoform with regard to some of the intermediates involved in phosphatidylinositol cycling. One of the products of the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol diphosphate is diacylglycerol enriched in arachidonic acid. The activity of the epsilon-isoform is known to be specific for this form of diacylglycerol. We show that in contrast, the activity of the zeta-isoform is lower against 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoylglycerol compared with dioleoylglycerol. We demonstrate that addition of phosphatidylserine, as well as other anionic phospholipids including L-alpha-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, strongly inhibits the epsilon-isoform, but these anionic lipids increase the activity of the zeta-isoform. Addition of Ca(2+), which is released from internal stores as a consequence of phosphatidylinositol cycling, promotes the activity of the epsilon-isoform of this enzyme but has little effect on the zeta-isoform. The contrasting conditions required for maximal activity of these two isoforms of diacylglycerol kinase, as well as their different substrate specificity, suggest that they have different physiological roles in signal transduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".