MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967013804 · doi:10.7202/201278ar

Cette autre-moi : hantise du double disparu dans le journal fictif féminin, de Conan à Monette et Noël

2006· article· fr· W1967013804 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Valérie Raoul

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La théorie du double comme technique romanesque, le Doppelgànger, s'est concentrée surtout sur les doubles masculins. Trois romans québécois écrits par des femmes - Angéline de Montbrun, de Laure Conan, Le Double Suspect, de Madeleine Monette et Babel, prise deux, de Francine Noël - fournissent des exemples d'un type de double féminin particulier. Il s'agit d'une femme aimée, qui est décédée en laissant un modèle d'écriture que la narratrice-personnage du roman prolonge dans ses propres écrits, au risque de se confondre avec ce double disparu. Dans les trois cas, ce phénomène se distingue du double masculin traditionnel par un rapport de collaboration et de solidarité avec l'autre-moi, qui contraste avec le schéma masculin de la destruction du double en faveur de la préservation du moi unique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207