MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967039750 · doi:10.1177/106689690000800106

Dysplasia in Chronic Ulcerative Colitis: A Molecular Approach to Its Differential Diagnosis

2000· article· en· W1967039750 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan J. Urbanski, Franz Fogt

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisDysplasiaMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseGastroenterologyProctocolectomyPathologyColitisPopulationInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ulcerative colitis-related epithelial dysplasia represents a premalignant lesion, which may lead to the development of ulcerative colitis-related adenocarcinoma. The proper management of this condition requires proctocolectomy before the acquisition of the invasive phenotype. Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis, however, like the general population, may develop sporadic colorectal adenomas not related to the presence of the inflammatory bowel disease. These adenomas are also characterized by epithelial dysplasia, but their detection carries very different clinical implications. It is therefore essential to distinguish between chronic ulcerative colitis-related dysplasia and sporadic colorectal adenomas. The gross and histologic features do not provide a definite distinction between these two different types of dysplasia of the colonic epithelium. Recent developments in the molecular genetics may provide the necessary means. Int J Surg Pathol 8(1):11-16, 2000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207