Experimental Investigation to Study Cutting Temperature During Milling of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The surface machining of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics (CFRP) materials is a challenging process, given the heterogeneity and anisotropic nature of these composites, which, combined with the abrasiveness of the fibers involved, can produce some surface damage and extensive tool wear. The cutting temperature is one of the most important factors associated with the tool wear rate and machinability of these materials, which are also affected by the mechanical and thermal properties of the work material and the cutting conditions. In this work, the cutting temperature, forces and surface roughness were measured under different cutting conditions during the ball-end milling of unidirectional CFRP. Cutting speeds ranging from 200 to 350 m/min, a feed rate of 0.063 mm/rev, fiber orientation of (the angle between carbon fibers and feed direction) 0, 45, 90 and 135 degrees, and a 0.5 mm depth of cut were used. The results show that the cutting speed and fiber orientation have a significant influence on the cutting temperature and cutting force. The maximum and minimum cutting forces and temperature were achieved for fiber orientations of 90 and 0 degrees, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".