MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967052305 · doi:10.1080/00207721.2012.669869

Backstepping-based synchronisation of uncertain networked Lagrangian systems

2012· article· en· W1967052305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Systems Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDivision of Emerging Frontiers in Research and InnovationDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBacksteppingConvergence (economics)Control theory (sociology)IntegratorNetwork topologyLagrangianSpanning treeComputer scienceMathematical optimizationConsensusMulti-agent systemMathematicsAdaptive controlControl (management)Applied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we study the synchronisation problem of uncertain networked Lagrangian systems on directed communication topologies. For the nominal model without uncertainties, we propose a backstepping-based synchronisation design for heterogenous Lagrangian systems on directed graphs with a spanning tree. We relax earlier constraints on the feedback gain for the distributed synchronisation control law, which encompasses the existing double integrator consensus problem as a special case. We then extend the proposed design to the case without relative velocity measurement. For the uncertain Lagrangian model, we develop a distributed adaptive redesign so that asymptotic synchronisation convergence is achieved in the presence of linearly parameterised model uncertainties. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it