MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967069029 · doi:10.1159/000112361

In vivo Phosphorylation of Myelin Basic Proteins in Developing Mouse Brain: Evidence that Phosphorylation Is an Early Event in Myelin Formation

2007· article· en· W1967069029 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff B. Ulmer, Peter E. Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMedical Research CouncilMultiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsMyelinMyelin basic proteinPhosphorylationIn vivoCell biologyBiologyProtein phosphorylationNeuroscienceChemistryBiochemistryCentral nervous systemGeneticsProtein kinase A

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myelin basic proteins (MBPs) can be detected in 5-day mouse brain, even though there is very little myelin present. In addition to the 4 MBP components (with molecular weights of 14, 17, 18.5 and 21.5 kilodaltons), that are commonly observed, other larger MBP-related polypeptides are also present. We have investigated the possibility of MBP phosphorylation at early stages of development in order to establish the point at which this modification occurs in the assembly of myelin. In vivo isotope studies show that in the 5-day mouse brain 14-, 17-, 18.5- and 21.5- kilodalton MBPs are phosphorylated and that they may be present in an immature form of myelin. Larger MBP-related proteins with a molecular weight of 35 and 42 kilodaltons are also phosphorylated but appear to be present mostly in nonmyelin structures or compartments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental NeuroscienceSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207