MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967108939 · doi:10.1177/082957350001600106

Concurrent Validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) with a Sample of Canadian Children

2000· article· en· W1967108939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of School Psychology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Abilities and Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWechsler Adult Intelligence ScalePsychologyWechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of IntelligenceWechsler Intelligence Scale for ChildrenIntelligence quotientTest validityTest (biology)Concurrent validityAchievement testDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyPsychometricsScale (ratio)Standardized testCognitionPsychiatryMathematics educationCartographyInternal consistency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI; Wechsler, 1999) subtest and IQ scores were correlated with the Canadian Achievement Tests/2 and the Canadian Test of Cognitive Skills using 64 grade four Canadian children. The pattern of correlations offer preliminary support for the use of the WASI in assessing the ability levels of Canadian school children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it