MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1967112890 · doi:10.1029/2010ja015448

Excitation and steepening of ion‐acoustic waves in the ionospheric Alfvén resonator

2010· article· en· W1967112890 on OpenAlexafffund
Dmytro Sydorenko, R. Rankin, К. Кабин

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsIonShock wavePlasmaIon acoustic waveExcitationShock (circulatory)Computational physicsAcoustic waveMechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonlinear two‐dimensional fluid model describing excitation of the ionospheric Alfvén resonator by a shear Alfvén wave coming from the magnetosphere is developed. Initially, the plasma is in an equilibrium defined by a balance between the gravity, electric field, and pressure gradient forces. This equilibrium is perturbed when a standing Alfvén wave is excited in the resonator. The nonlinear Lorentz force of the wave creates converging and diverging plasma flows along the geomagnetic field, thus producing compressions and rarefactions in the plasma density. Simulation reveals that density perturbations evolve into ion‐acoustic shock waves in a process similar to the nonlinear steepening of sound waves in neutral gases. A shock associated with compression of hydrogen ions propagates faster than a shock associated with compression of oxygen ions. One‐dimensional shock‐capturing Poisson simulation reveals that the shocks appear as double layers at first, but then they decay into ion‐acoustic wave packets. The drop of potential across each shock is negligible at any stage of shock's development, making these shocks unfavorable for auroral electron acceleration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→