Opération 20 000 logements et l'espace social de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'espace social de la ville peut être vu de façon dynamique si on le considère comme un système d'actions qui prévoient des transformations rapides du tissu social. Partant d'une recherche sur l'accession à la propriété à Montréal, nous en venons à penser que la stratification socio-économique de la population n'est plus le seul facteur à considérer dans les analyses de l'espace social. Certains aspects socioculturels doivent être invoqués pour rendre compte de la diversité des nouvelles clientèles qui régénèrent les villes centrales. La consommation de la «centralité» par les nouveaux ménages fortunés échappe à la seule logique de la ségrégation économique et sociale ; d'autres qui ne sont pas au sommet de la structure sociale partagent ce nouveau mode de l'«habiter» urbain. Ensemble, ils perpétuent la pluralité complexe à l'origine même de la définition de la ville.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".