A three-dimensional model for bolted connections in wood
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent criticism of the bolted connection requirements in the Canadian wood design code CSA Standard O86 indicates that the code lacks consideration of the different modes of failure, particularly as they relate to multiple-bolt connections. A finite element model is proposed to predict loaddisplacement behaviour, stress distributions, ultimate strength, and mode of failure in single- and multiple-bolt connections. The three-dimensional (3-D) model uses anisotropic plasticity for the wood member and elastoplasticity for the bolt. The Weibull weakest link theory is used to predict failure at given levels of probability. Predictions for connection behaviour in Douglas-fir and laminated strand lumber (LSL) correspond to experimentally observed behaviour. The output from the 3-D model is used for a multiple-bolt connection spring model to illustrate many of the phenomena described in the literature.Key words: bolt, Douglas-fir, connection, model, plasticity, weakest link, wood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it