MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967151836 · doi:10.2118/154019-ms

Accurate Modelling of Pore-Scale Film and Layer Flow for Three-Phase EOR in Carbonate Rocks with Arbitrary Wettability

2012· article· en· W1967151836 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Adnan Al-Dhahli, S. Geiger, Marinus Izaak Jan Van Dijke

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCMG Reservoir Simulation Foundation
KeywordsRelative permeabilityWettingCapillary pressurePermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringSaturation (graph theory)Residual oilEnhanced oil recoveryMultiphase flowPorous mediumNetwork modelGeologyFlow (mathematics)Two-phase flowMaterials scienceMechanicsGeotechnical engineeringPorosityComputer scienceChemistryArtificial intelligenceComposite materialMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three-phase flow is a key to many EOR techniques such as Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection. Predicting oil recovery during three-phase EOR in carbonates requires a sound understanding of the fundamental flow physics in mixed- to oil-wet rocks to derive physically robust flow functions, i.e. relative permeability and capillary pressure. In this work we use pore-network modelling, a reliable and physically-based simulation tool, to predict the flow functions. We have developed a new pore-scale network model for rocks with variable wettability, from mixed to oil-wet. It comprises a constrained set of parameters that mimic the wetting state of a reservoir. Unlike other models, it combines three main features: (1) A novel thermodynamic criterion for formation and collapse of oil layers. The new model hence captures wetting film and layer flow of oil adequately, which affects the oil relative permeability at low oil saturation and leads to accurate prediction of residual oil. (2) Multiple displacement chains, where injection of one phase at the inlet triggers a chain of interface displacements throughout the network. This allows accurate modeling of the mobilization of many disconnected phase clusters that arise during higher order (WAG) floods. (3) The model takes realistic 3D pore-networks extracted from pore-space reconstruction methods and CT images as input, preserving both topology and pore shape of the rock. We validated our network model by comparing 2D network simulations with published data from WAG floods in oil-wet micromodels. This demonstrates the importance of film and layer flow for the continuity of the various phases during subsequent WAG cycles and for the residual oil saturations. A sensitivity analysis has been carried out with the full 3D model to predict three-phase relative permeabilities and residual oil saturations for WAG cycles under various wetting conditions with different flood end-points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Improved Oil Recovery SymposiumSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207