MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1967161291 · doi:10.1109/crv.2014.46

Toward a Unified Framework for EMG Signals Processing and Controlling an Exoskeleton

2014· article· en· W1967161291 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Durandau, Wael Suleiman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExoskeletonElectromyographyComputer scienceElbowMotion (physics)Joint (building)SimulationMotion captureControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)Physical medicine and rehabilitationStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a control method of robotic system using electromyography (EMG) signals collected by surface EMG electrodes. The EMG signals are analyzed using a neuromusculoskeletal (NMS) model that represents at the same time the muscle and the skeleton of the body. It has the advantage of adding external forces to the model without changing the initial parameters which is particularly useful for the control of exoskeletons. The algorithm has been validated through experiments consisting of moving only the elbow joint freely or while handling a barbell having various sets of loads. The results of our algorithm are then compared to the motions obtained by a motion capture system during the same session. The comparison points out the efficiency of our algorithm for predicting and estimating the arm motion using only EMG signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→