MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967170995 · doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5669

Short-term feed restriction impairs the absorptive function of the reticulo-rumen and total tract barrier function in beef cattle1

2013· article· en· W1967170995 on OpenAlexaff
S. Zhang, Rodrigo I. Albornoz, Jörg R. Aschenbach, Daniel R. Barreda, G.B. Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceRumenDry matterForageBeef cattleChemistryBiologyAgronomyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether different severities of short-term feed restriction (FR) affect the absorptive function of the reticulo-rumen and total tract barrier function in beef cattle. Eighteen ruminally cannulated and ovariectomized Angus × Hereford heifers were blocked by BW into 3 blocks, with blocks conducted sequentially. Treatments were imposed during the 5-d FR period by restricting heifers to 75 (FR75), 50 (FR50) or 25% (FR25) of the ad libitum feed intake measured during a 5-d baseline period (BASE) occurring immediately before FR. Throughout the study, heifers were housed in individual pens (9 m(2)) and were fed the same diet (60% forage:40% concentrate) with free access to water. Dry matter intake was measured daily and ruminal pH was measured every 2 min throughout the study. Ruminal fluid and blood samples were collected on d 3 of the BASE and FR periods, and the temporarily isolated and washed reticulo-rumen technique was used to evaluate short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) absorption on d 5 of the BASE and FR periods. Total tract barrier function was evaluated starting on d 2 of the BASE and FR periods using a pulse dose of Cr-EDTA followed by 48 h of total urine collection. Data were analyzed using the Proc Mixed procedure of SAS with the fixed effects of block, treatment, period, and the treatment × period interaction, the random effect of cow nested in block with period included as a repeated measure. Dry matter intake did not differ among treatments during BASE but, as imposed by the experimental model, DMI during FR relative to BASE equated to 70, 49, and 25%, which was close to the targeted values of 75, 50, and 25% (treatment × period, P < 0.001). A treatment × period interaction (P < 0.001) was also detected for ruminal SCFA concentration with the concentration decreasing as the severity of FR increased, whereas there were no differences during BASE. Mean ruminal pH increased during FR with increasing severity of FR, but was not different during BASE (treatment × period, P < 0.001). Absorption of SCFA across the reticulo-rumen tended to decrease with increasing severity of FR (P = 0.08). For individual SCFA, acetate absorption (mmol/h) tended (P = 0.057) to be less for FR25 and FR50 when compared with FR75 and decreased (P = 0.05) by almost 70 mmol/h at FR25 and FR50 relative to BASE (322mmol/h). Heifers restricted to 25% (FR25) feed had greater urinary Cr recovery during FR than BASE, whereas no changes were detected for FR75 and FR50. This study indicates that moderate severities of short-term FR decrease the absorptive function of the reticulo-rumen, but more severe FR is required to compromise total tract barrier function in beef cattle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207