La contribution des femmes naskapies aux travaux de la vie quotidienne à l’époque de Fort McKenzie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basé sur les résultats d'une enquête ethnographique menée auprès de la communauté naskapie de Kawawachikamach (Schefferville, Québec), l'article met l'accent sur la vie des femmes naskapies durant la première moitié du XX e siècle. Outre qu'il documente une époque peu connue de l'histoire de ce peuple de chasseurs nomades, il présente la contribution particulière des femmes à la vie familiale et à la vie communautaire. En s'attachant à la fois au cycle de vie et au cycle annuel des activités, les auteures attirent l'attention sur la diversité et la flexibilité des tâches accomplies par les femmes en tous lieux (au comptoir de traite, dans les campements d'hiver, sur le territoire) et en toutes circonstances (les déplacements saisonniers, les rassemblements communautaires, les naissances, les mariages). Sur le plan théorique, l'information mise au jour pose la question de la pénétration du capitalisme marchand en milieu nordique québécois et de son influence sur la transformation des rapports entre les femmes et les hommes dans la division des tâches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".