MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967186232 · doi:10.5539/mas.v3n7p128

Optimal Guaranteed Cost Control of an Uncertainty System and its Application

2009· article· en· W1967186232 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Min Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLinear matrix inequalityControl theory (sociology)Upper and lower boundsConvex optimizationMathematical optimizationMissileInterval (graph theory)Controller (irrigation)Cost controlComputer scienceOptimization problemMathematicsRegular polygonControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The non-fragile guaranteed controller design problem for an interval system and a given cost function is discussed. A sufficient condition is established such that the closed-loop system stability and cost function is guaranteed to be no more than a certain upper bound with all admissible uncertainties as well as a controller gain perturbation uncertainty. A modified interval system described by matrix factorization will lead to less conservative conclusions. An effective linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach is developed to solve the addressed problem. Furthermore, a convex optimization problem is formulated to design the optimal non-fragile guaranteed cost controller which minimizes the upper bound of the closed-loop system cost. The effectiveness of this approach has been verified on a missile launched underwater attitude control system design. Simulation results on a real example are presented to validate the proposed design approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207