Coupling immunoaffinity techniques with MS for quantitative analysis of low-abundance protein biomarkers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The field of proteomics is rapidly turning towards targeted mass spectrometry (MS) methods to quantify putative markers or known proteins of biological interest. Historically, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been used for targeted protein analysis, but, unfortunately, it is limited by the excessive time required for antibody preparation, as well as concerns over selectivity. Despite the ability of proteomics to deliver increasingly quantitative measurements, owing to limited sensitivity, the leads generated are in the microgram per milliliter range. This stands in stark contrast to ELISA, which is capable of quantifying proteins at low picogram per milliliter levels. To bridge this gap, targeted liquid chromatography (LC) tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis of tryptic peptide surrogates using selected reaction monitoring detection has emerged as a viable option for rapid quantification of target proteins. The precision of this approach has been enhanced by the use of stable isotope-labeled peptide internal standards to compensate for variation in recovery and the influence of differential matrix effects. Unfortunately, the complexity of proteinaceous matrices, such as plasma, limits the usefulness of this approach to quantification in the mid-nanogram per milliliter range (medium-abundance proteins). This article reviews the current status of LC/MS/MS using selected reaction monitoring for protein quantification, and specifically considers the use of a single antibody to achieve superior enrichment of either the protein target or the released tryptic peptide. Examples of immunoaffinity-assisted LC/MS/MS are reviewed that demonstrate quantitative analysis of low-abundance proteins (subnanogram per milliliter range). A strategy based on this technology is proposed for the expedited evaluation of novel protein biomarkers, which relies on the synergy created from the complementary nature of MS and ELISA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it