Voluntary Action History Society Fifth International Conference, University of Huddersfield, 10-12 July 2013
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over seventy delegates, representing more than thirty institutions from Europe and North America, came together at the University of Huddersfield for the Fifth International Conference of the Voluntary Action History Society (VAHS). The VAHS was founded in 1991 with the mandate to promote the historical study of voluntary action and of charitable and voluntary organizations. Since then it has been actively pursuing this objective through a permanent seminar series at the Institute of Historical Research, new researcher training and networking events, an edited blog, and a biennial conference. The panels of this year’s conference were organized around six themes, and presenters were encouraged to take a transnational approach to their subject. The themes were: state and voluntary action, activism and campaigning, humanitarianism and relief, wars and voluntarism, leisure and voluntary action, and co-ops and mutualism. The guidelines invited participants to think beyond the national frameworks which have, until recently, dominated...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.102 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it