Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’intérêt de Nishida Kitarō (1870-1945) pour la théologie chrétienne répond à un but essentiellement philosophique. À travers son utilisation de thèmes théologiques, il s’efforça d’approfondir ses propres concepts philosophiques et de montrer qu’une juste compréhension du fait religieux repose sur une compréhension adéquate de sa « logique du lieu » (場所的論理, basho-teki ronri). Il parvint ainsi à établir une chose très importante pour la compréhension de l’être humain : le soi est un lieu. Non limité au statut de sujet connaissant classifiant des objets de connaissance et détaché de l’aspect intuitif de la connaissance, le soi devient le lieu même de la rencontre avec Dieu. Il peut alors se posséder dans ce qui le dépasse absolument au fondement de lui-même et s’affirmer, comme le fait Dieu lui-même, au sein de l’autonégation, devenant alors un individu véritable ou un soi véritable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".