MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967253240 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.235330

Theory of excitonic artificial atoms: InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots in strong magnetic fields

2003· article· en· W1967253240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetic fieldQuantum dotDegenerate energy levelsElectronExcitonCondensed matter physicsExcitationSpectral lineAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a theory of excitonic artificial atoms in strong magnetic fields. The excitonic atoms are formed by N electrons and holes confined in a quantum dot. The single-particle levels are described by the Fock-Darwin spectrum in a magnetic field. The magnetic field induces crossing of energy levels and allows us to engineer degenerate shells. We apply exact diagonalization techniques to calculate the magnetic-field evolution of the ground state of the N-electron-hole complex and its emission spectra. We focus on degenerate shells and show that excitons condense into correlated states due to hidden symmetry. We relate the Fock-Darwin spectrum, hidden symmetries, and direct and exchange interaction among particles to the emission spectra as a function of number of electron-hole pairs (excitation power) and magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it