Fermi-Amaldi model for exchange-correlation: atomic excitation energies from orbital energy differences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivated by recent work on asymptotic correct exchange-correlation potentials, this paper investigates properties of the Fermi-Amaldi model for the exchange-correlation potential. It compares atomic excitation energies for Hydrogen through Argon to orbital energy differences computed using the exact Kohn-Sham potential and the Fermi-Amaldi approximation to the Kohn-Sham potential. While the Fermi-Amaldi model is not a particularly good model for the exchange-correlation energy, its eigenvalue spectrum is semi-quantitatively correct for alkali metals and alkaline earths. However, it is not accurate for p-block atoms, which suggests that the Fermi-Amaldi model may not be a superior choice for asymptotically correcting exchange-correlation potentials. It is suggested that asymptotic correction involving the Fukui function would give better results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it