MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967288457 · doi:10.1190/1.3378764

Rapid construction of equivalent sources using wavelets

2010· article· en· W1967288457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNewmont Corporation
KeywordsWaveletDiscrete wavelet transformSecond-generation wavelet transformWavelet packet decompositionStationary wavelet transformFast wavelet transformWavelet transformCascade algorithmOrthonormal basisMathematicsLegendre waveletMatrix (chemical analysis)AlgorithmLifting schemeHarmonic wavelet transformDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer scienceMathematical analysisArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have developed a fast algorithm for generating an equivalent source by using fast wavelet transforms based on orthonormal, compactly supported wavelets. We apply a 2D wavelet transform to each row and column of the coefficient matrix and subsequently threshold the transformed matrix to generate a sparse representation in the wavelet domain. The algorithm then uses this sparse matrix to construct the the equivalent source directly in the wavelet domain. Performing an inverse wavelet transform then yields the equivalent source in the space domain. Using upward continuation of total-field magnetic data between uneven surfaces as examples, we have compared this approach with the direct solution using the dense matrix in the space domain. We have shown that the wavelet approach can reduce the CPU time by as many as two orders of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it