SELF-STABILIZING COMPUTATION OF 3-EDGE-CONNECTED COMPONENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A self-stabilizing algorithm is a distributed algorithm that can start from any initial (legitimate or illegitimate) state and eventually converge to a legitimate state in finite time without being assisted by any external agent. In this paper, we propose a self-stabilizing algorithm for finding the 3-edge-connected components of an asynchronous distributed computer network. The algorithm stabilizes in O(dnΔ) rounds and every processor requires O(n log Δ) bits, where Δ(≤ n) is an upper bound on the degree of a node, d(≤ n) is the diameter of the network, and n is the total number of nodes in the network. These time and space complexity are at least a factor of n better than those of the previously best-known self-stabilizing algorithm for 3-edge-connectivity. The result of the computation is kept in a distributed fashion by assigning, upon stabilization of the algorithm, a component identifier to each processor which uniquely identifies the 3-edge-connected component to which the processor belongs. Furthermore, the algorithm is designed in such a way that its time complexity is dominated by that of the self-stabilizing depth-first search spanning tree construction in the sense that any improvement made in the latter automatically implies improvement in the time complexity of the algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".