MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967307385 · doi:10.1063/1.126477

Refractive indices of InGaAsP lattice-matched to GaAs at wavelengths relevant to device design

2000· article· en· W1967307385 on OpenAlexaff
Steven G. Wallace, B. J. Robinson, Peter Mascher, H. K. Haugen, D. A. Thompson, Dan Dalacu, L. Martinů

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEllipsometryMaterials scienceMolecular beam epitaxyWavelengthRefractive indexOptoelectronicsOpticsErbiumEpitaxyLaserLattice (music)Gallium arsenideAmplifierDopingLattice constantThin filmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The refractive indices of In1−xGaxAsyP1−y grown lattice-matched to GaAs by gas-source molecular-beam epitaxy, have been measured by variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry. Indices in the transparent regime of these quaternaries, at 980 and 808 nm (relevant to the design of pump sources for erbium-doped fiber amplifiers and Nd:YAG lasers, respectively) and at 850 nm, are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207