MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Krukenberg Tumor of Renal Pelvic Origin: Report of a Case With Selected Comments on Ovarian Tumors Metastatic From the Urinary Tract

2006· article· en· W1967309413 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Irving, DeEtte R. Vasques, Timothy B. McGuinness, Robert H. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathologyUrinary systemKrukenberg tumorMetastasisCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metastatic tumors to the ovary are infrequently of urinary tract origin. In approximate descending order of frequency, this subset of secondary ovarian neoplasms includes renal cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, and urachal adenocarcinomas. These tumors usually raise a differential in turn of primary ovarian clear cell, transitional cell, or mucinous carcinomas. Only rare metastatic signet-ring adenocarcinomas of the bladder have shown the features of a Krukenberg tumor. We report the case of a 74-year old woman with bilateral Krukenberg tumors metastatic from a primary renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma with glandular and signet-ring cell differentiation. This unique case reinforces that tumors with signet-ring cell morphology have a propensity to metastasize to the ovary, and indicates that renal pelvic carcinoma rarely may be the source of Krukenberg tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological PathologySame topicUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesFrench-language works237,207