MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967317723 · doi:10.2174/092986612799363181

N-terminal Purification Tag Alters Thermal Stability of the Carboxylesterase EstGtA2 from G. thermodenitrificans by Impairing Reversibility of Thermal Unfolding

2012· article· en· W1967317723 on OpenAlexaff
David M. Charbonneau, Fatma Meddeb‐Mouelhi, Marc Beauregard

Bibliographic record

VenueProtein and Peptide Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircular dichroismThermal stabilityPeptideCarboxylesteraseChemistryEnzymeRecombinant DNAThermostabilityBiophysicsBiochemistryCrystallographyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The novel thermostable carboxylesterase EstGtA2 from G. thermodenitrificans (accession no. AEN92268) was functionally expressed and purified using an N-terminal fusion tag peptide. We recently reported general properties of the recombinant enzyme. Here we report preliminary data on thermal stability of EstGtA2 and of its tagged form. Conformational stability was investigated using circular dichroism and correlated with residual activity measurements using a colorimetric assay. The tag peptide had no considerable impact on the apparent melting temperature: T(m) value = 64.8°C (tagged) and 65.7°C (cleaved) at pH 8. After thermal unfolding, the tag-free enzyme rapidly recovered initial activity at 25°C (1.2 Umg(-1)), which was corroborated by substantial refolding (83%) as determined by far-UV CD transitions. However, after thermal unfolding, the purification tag drastically decreased specific activity at 25°C (0.07 Umg(-1)). This was corroborated by the absence of refolding transition. Although the purification tag has no undesirable impact on activity before thermal unfolding as well as on Tm, it drastically hinders EstGtA2 refolding resulting in a major loss of thermal stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtein and Peptide LettersSame topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207