MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967381609 · doi:10.4161/cc.6.22.4926

Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases: Emerging Regulators of Apoptosis

2007· review· en· W1967381609 on OpenAlexaff
Maxime Hallé, Michel L. Tremblay, Tzu‐Ching Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyProtein tyrosine phosphataseCell biologyPhosphorylationApoptosisProgrammed cell deathTyrosine phosphorylationPhosphataseSignal transductionGeneTyrosineCleavage (geology)CaspaseGeneticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apoptosis is a precisely controlled physiological mechanism that is required for the elimination of cells during embryonic development, in response to stress and infection as well as in the maintenance of homeostasis. Since the outcome of several of these biological processes is regulated by signaling events involving tyrosine phosphorylation, members of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) gene family are expected to be of primary importance. Here, we summarize the current literature linking the activities of classical PTPs with the regulation of apoptosis. The recent discovery of caspase-cleavage mediated modulation of a member of this family, PTP-PEST, indicates that other PTPs could be modulated in a similar manner. In light of this, we present an analysis of all murine and human PTPs gene for the presence of putative caspase cleavage motifs. Additional studies linking the activity of PTPs to their own regulation during programmed cell death initiation should provide important insight into the understanding of this fundamental physiological phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesFrench-language works237,207