Outcome of mobile ear surgery for chronic otitis media in remote areas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Inuit of Greenland, Canada and Alaska suffer from chronic otitis media (COM). In Greenland these patients used to be referred to Denmark for ear surgery. This was expensive and unsatisfactory, and the results were poor. A mobile ear surgery project was developed. DESIGN: The study is longitudinal and prospective with follow-up. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The 274 patients were selected according to severity of COM and hearing loss. Only air conduction (AC) audiometry was obtained. Median age was 27 years and 55% were females. RESULTS: Closure rates at three weeks, one year, and two years were 67 percent, 72 percent, and 76 percent, respectively. Median AC pure tone average improvement was 15 dB and 12 dB after one year and two years, and 73 percent and 67 percent were satisfied. Outcome was associated with quality of the surgical skills (P < 0.002). We found marked spontaneous fluctuations between the follow-ups. CONCLUSION: The results of mobile ear surgery in Greenland are acceptable. Mobile ear surgery may be implemented in areas with limited access to health care, eg, in developing countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".