Modeling of Feed Vaporization in Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Feed vaporization in the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process affects the yield of valuable products in risers and downers. Feedstock droplets sprayed into a fluid cracker undergo both homogeneous vaporization in the gas phase and heterogeneous vaporization as they collide with catalyst particles. This paper models both processes. Homogeneous vaporization, with both convection and radiation heat transfer, cannot completely vaporize oil droplets with diameters larger than 10 μm. Spraying droplets into a dilute cloud of catalyst particles forms a “tunnel” of hydrocarbon vapor that minimizes droplet−catalyst contact and vaporization. Alternately, spraying the droplets onto a dense jet of catalyst particles does not provide proper heat transfer and vaporization. Modeling indicated that the best way of ensuring fast vaporization of oil droplets in FCC risers and downers is to spray the droplets onto a jet of catalyst particles with a porosity ranging between 70 and 90%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".