MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967455125 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.025

Selective loss of glycogen synthase kinase-3α in birds reveals distinct roles for GSK-3 isozymes in tau phosphorylation

2011· article· en· W1967455125 on OpenAlexafffund
Lina Alon, Shmuel Pietrokovski, Shay Barkan, Limor Avrahami, Oksana Kaidanovich‐Beilin, James R. Woodgett, Anat Barnea, Hagit Eldar-Finkelman

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIsozymeGSK-3PhosphorylationBiologyGlycogen synthaseGSK3BGeneKnockout mouseKinaseGlycogenBiochemistryATP synthaseGene knockoutCell biologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mammalian glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), a critical regulator in neuronal signaling, cognition, and behavior, exists as two isozymes GSK-3α and GSK-3β. Their distinct biological functions remains largely unknown. Here, we examined the evolutionary significance of each of these isozymes. Surprisingly, we found that unlike other vertebrates that harbor both GSK-3 genes, the GSK-3α gene is missing in birds. GSK-3-mediated tau phosphorylation was significantly lower in adult bird brains than in mouse brains, a phenomenon that was reproduced in GSK-3α knockout mouse brains. Tau phosphorylation was detected in brains from bird embryos suggesting that GSK-3 isozymes play distinct roles in tau phosphorylation during development. Birds are natural GSK-3α knockout organisms and may serve as a novel model to study the distinct functions of GSK-3 isozymes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerFrench-language works237,207