MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967493904 · doi:10.1063/1.533353

Wave operators for the surface Maryland model

2000· article· en· W1967493904 on OpenAlexafffund
Vojkan Jakšić, Stanislav Molchanov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaplace operatorEigenfunctionMathematicsSpectrum (functional analysis)Diophantine equationRational numberDirichlet distributionSurface (topology)Mathematical physicsCombinatoricsDirichlet boundary conditionDiophantine approximationMathematical analysisBoundary value problemPhysicsQuantum mechanicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study scattering properties of the discrete Laplacian H on the half-space Z+d+1=Zd×Z+ with the boundary condition ψ(n,−1)=λ tan(πα⋅n+θ)ψ(n,0), where α∈[0,1]d. We denote by H0 the Dirichlet Laplacian on Z+d+1. Khoruzenko and Pastur [Phys. Rep. 288, 109–126 (1997)] have shown that if α has typical Diophantine properties then the spectrum of H on R\σ(H0) is pure point and that corresponding eigenfunctions decay exponentially. We demonstrated in an earlier paper [Lett. Math. Phys. 45, 185 (1998)] that for every α independent over the rationals the spectrum of H on σ(H0) is purely absolutely continuous. In this paper, we continue the analysis of H on σ(H0) and prove that whenever α is independent over the rationals, the wave operators Ω±(H,H0) exist and are complete on σ(H0). Moreover, we show that under the same conditions H has no surface states on σ(H0).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicSpectral Theory in Mathematical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207