MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

From Spin Glass to Quantum Spin Liquid Ground States in Molybdate Pyrochlores

2014· article· en· W1967514295 on OpenAlexafffund
Lucy Clark, Gøran J. Nilsen, E. Kermarrec, G. Ehlers, Kevin S. Knight, Andrew Harrison, J. Paul Attfield, B. D. Gaulin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsBrockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcMaster University
FundersBasic Energy SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsQuantum spin liquidGround stateSpin glassSpin (aerodynamics)AntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsPhysicsNeutron scatteringMaterials scienceScatteringAtomic physicsSpin polarizationQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present new magnetic heat capacity and neutron scattering results for two magnetically frustrated molybdate pyrochlores: $S=1$ oxide ${\mathrm{Lu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Mo}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ and $S=\frac{1}{2}$ oxynitride ${\mathrm{Lu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Mo}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{5}{\mathrm{N}}_{2}$. ${\mathrm{Lu}}_{2}{\mathrm{Mo}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ undergoes a transition to an unconventional spin glass ground state at ${T}_{f}\ensuremath{\sim}16\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{K}$. However, the preparation of the corresponding oxynitride tunes the nature of the ground state from spin glass to quantum spin liquid. The comparison of the static and dynamic spin correlations within the oxide and oxynitride phases presented here reveals the crucial role played by quantum fluctuations in the selection of a ground state. Furthermore, we estimate an upper limit for a gap in the spin excitation spectrum of the quantum spin liquid state of the oxynitride of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\sim}0.05\text{ }\mathrm{meV}$ or $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}/|\ensuremath{\theta}|\ensuremath{\sim}0.004$, in units of its antiferromagnetic Weiss constant $\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{-}121\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{K}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207