MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967542553 · doi:10.1042/bse0480221

Epigenetic regulation of V(D)J recombination

2010· review· en· W1967542553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEssays in Biochemistry · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsDicentric chromosomeEpigeneticsChromatinBiologyV(D)J recombinationGeneticsRecombinationDNAComputational biologyChromosomeGeneKaryotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chromosome breaks are dangerous business, carrying the risk of loss of genetic information or, even worse, misrepair of the break, leading to outcomes such as dicentric chromosomes or oncogenic translocations. Yet V(D)J recombination, a process that breaks, rearranges and repairs chromosomes, is crucial to the development of the adaptive immune system, for it gives B- and T-cells the capacity to generate a virtually unlimited repertoire of antigen receptor proteins to combat an equally vast array of antigens. To minimize the risks inherent in chromosomal breakage, V(D)J recombination is carefully orchestrated at multiple levels, ranging from DNA sequence requirements all the way up to chromatin conformation and nuclear architecture. In the present chapter we introduce various regulatory controls, with an emphasis on epigenetic mechanisms and recent work that has begun to elucidate their interdependence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it