MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967562798 · doi:10.1002/nha3.10118

Old Planet, New Millennium, Same Excuses?: Taking Responsibility: The Need for Adult Environmental Education

2000· article· en· W1967562798 on OpenAlexaff
Tarah Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsMacEwan UniversityAthabasca UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental educationSustainabilityHumanityEnvironmental adult educationArgument (complex analysis)Environmental ethicsPoliticsAffect (linguistics)PlanetSocial responsibilitySociologyEnvironmental movementPsychologyPolitical sciencePublic relationsEcologyPedagogyBiologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education is recognized as an essential component to the advancement of humans living sustainably with the environment. While it is critical to instill an environmental ethic in school children, it is equally important for environmental education to be directed towards adults, as they make consumer, social and political decisions that affect our world. This brief paper explores adult environmental education and its importance within the environmental movement. The underlying argument is that the health of humanity and the planet can be improved through adult environmental education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource DevelopmentSame topicReligion, Ecology, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207