MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967574309 · doi:10.3917/rief.023.0039

Les besoins parentaux au regard de la formation à l'implication scolaire au Québec

2008· article· fr· W1967574309 on OpenAlexaffabout
François Larose, Bernard Terrisse, Johanne Bédard

Bibliographic record

VenueLa revue internationale de l éducation familiale · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Dans cet article, nous procédons d’abord à une synthèse de la documentation scientifique au regard des principaux facteurs expliquant l’auto-exclusion des parents de milieux-socio économiquement faibles au plan de la participation à la vie scolaire ainsi que le faible encadrement des activités de nature scolaire de leurs enfants. Dans un deuxième temps, nous faisons état de certains des résultats d’une enquête nationale québécoise portant sur les besoins d’information et de formation des parents d’enfants d’âge préscolaire et primaire au regard de l’exercice des compétences éducatives parentales. Après avoir identifié les variables de nature socioéconomique en tant que principaux prédicteurs de la demande d’information et de formation de la part des parents d’élèves en âge de fréquentation scolaire maternelle et primaire, nous proposons diverses pistes, à la fois de nature organisationnelle et curriculaire, pouvant être exploitées par le milieu scolaire afin de rétablir le lien école-famille-communauté au sein des populations les plus vulnérables de la société québécoise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa revue internationale de l éducation familialeSame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207