MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967585049 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2013.6723431

A novel high resolution optical SAR processor for satellite applications

2013· article· en· W1967585049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Penghao Zhao, Kaizhi Wang, Xingzhao Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)SatelliteSynthetic aperture radarImage resolutionTransformation (genetics)Doppler effectComputer hardwareRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Onboard SAR data imaging is increasingly important for many satellite applications. And optical SAR processor is one promising solution due to its extremely quick calculation speed, simple structure and strong radiation hardness. Recent relative researches done by researchers of National Optics Institute in Canada prove the feasibility of optical processor, but its resolution of 30 meter is relatively low. This paper proposes a novel high resolution optical SAR processor which is based on the Range Doppler Algorithm. The processor includes two main elements: the optical one-dimensional Fourier transformation element and the spatial light modulator (SLM). The usage of several SLMs gives wider parameter adjustment boundary and more flexibility to the processor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207