Sequestration of <sup>3</sup> H-Vitamin D <sub>3</sub> by the Fetal and Neonatal Rat Liver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
19- to 21-day-old fetuses as well as 3-, 7-, 14-, and 22-day-old pups were used to evaluate the sequestration of a tracer dose of 3H-D3 by the fetal and neonatal rat liver. In fetuses, 3H-D3 was injected directly into the umbilical vein; in neonates, 3H-D3 was injected into the portal vein. In both cases, 14C-sucrose was used as extracellular marker. 3H-D3 sequestration was evaluated at 11.3 +/- 1.1% (means +/- SEM) in fetuses, 3.3 +/- 0.6, 4.9 +/- 0.6, 6.3 +/- 0.5 0.5 and 42.0 +/- 1.9% of the dose administered in 3-, 7-, 14-, and 22-day-old rats, respectively. These results clearly show that, in the rat, the fetal liver can take up 3H-D3. Moreover, when compared to the values obtained in the late fetal period, 3H-D3 uptake decreased significantly during the first 2 weeks post partum (p less than 0.0001) and then dramatically increased (6-fold, p less than 0.0001) between days 14 and 22 post partum, when it reached an uptake capacity similar to that previously observed in adult rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".