MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Technique for the Evaluation of Instantaneous Heat Fluxes for the Horizontal Strip Casting of Aluminum Alloys.

2001· article· en· W1967624797 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISIJ International · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsMaterials scienceHeat transferHeat transfer coefficientSuperheatingSubstrate (aquarium)Heat fluxComposite materialThermocoupleAluminiumMetallurgyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transient heat transfer between solidifying light metals strips and a moving substrate has been investigated. For this purpose, an experimental apparatus was constructed, consisting of a cold moving substrate onto which molten metal from a containment mold is deposited. The substrate was flame sprayed with various commercial coatings while its speed and the thicknesses of strip produced matched industrial values. The primary objective of this work was to study the effects of some important variables, such as roughness of substrate, type of coating, thickness of strip and initial superheat, on heat fluxes. Substrate speeds in the range of 0.4–1.2 m/s were employed and strips with thicknesses between 1 and 5 mm were produced. The heat fluxes were determined "inversely" by an inverse heat transfer technique, using temperature measurements from thermocouples embedded within the substrate. Peak heat fluxes between 0.6 and 3.0 MW/m2 were found for the diverse experimental conditions investigated. The heat transfer coefficients were deduced using a one-dimensional, finite-difference model, based on the corresponding calculated heat fluxes. Values of h ranged from 700–5000 W/m2·K. The various coatings used, and the different levels of substrate roughness, contributed to the wide range of h values reported. The heat transfer coefficient was found to increase with initial superheat, thickness of strip and smoother coatings. Correlations were derived between peak heat fluxes and the most significant variables. More importantly, the transient evolution of q and h after their peak values were assessed and good correlations could be derived. The findings of this work are believed to be useful for industrial processes, since they give a better picture of the influence of some important variables on the heat transfer involved for this particular type of metal-substrate contact. This is relevant, for example, to horizontal direct strip casting processes currently under investigation for the production of low carbon steel strips.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it