MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967642027 · doi:10.1049/el:20030416

Unconditionally stable Crank-Nicolson scheme for solving two-dimensional Maxwell's equations

2003· article· en· W1967642027 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrank–Nicolson methodMaxwell's equationsMathematicsScheme (mathematics)Applied mathematicsScattering-matrix methodMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Crank-Nicolson method is an unconditionally stable, implicit numerical scheme with second-order accuracy in both time and space. When applied to solve Maxwell's equations in two-dimensions, the resulting matrix is block tri-diagonal, which is very expensive to solve. The Douglas-Gunn algorithm is used to subdivide the update procedure into two sub-steps. At each sub-step only a tri-diagonal matrix needs to be solved for one field component. The other two field components are updated explicitly in one step. The numerical dispersion relations are given for the original Crank-Nicolson scheme and for the Douglas-Gunn modification. The predicted numerical dispersion is shown to agree with numerical experiments, and its numerical anisotropy is shown to be much smaller than that of the ADI-FDTD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it