MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Graphite Addition on the Mechanical Properties of Stir Cast Particulate Aluminum Metal Matrix Composite Reinforced with Alumina and Silicon Carbide

2014· article· en· W1967645947 on OpenAlexaff
Swanand R. Kulkarni, Parshuram M. Sonawane, Madhuri Karnik

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceGraphiteComposite materialComposite numberUltimate tensile strengthAluminiumSilicon carbideCastingAlloyTribologyMatrix (chemical analysis)Metal matrix compositeFabricationMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fabrication of PAMC by stir casting, at semisolid stage of the matrix results in homogeneous distribution of the reinforcements in the matrix, which leads to better mechanical and tribological property of the composite. In present study aluminum alloy Al6082 was reinforced with 1% Al2O3 and 3% SiC and 0 to 6% graphite particles by weight. We have varied temperature, speed of agitation and kept all other parameters constant. With present stir casting process, we have successfully processed the total reinforcement up to15% by weight. PAMC has shown 23% increase in hardness, 110% increase in tensile strength and 54% increase in the stiffness. With increase in the graphite reinforcement, coefficient of friction and wear rate of PAMC decreases. Coefficient of friction stabilizes between 0.3 to 0.33 and wear rate stabilizes near to 0.00005 mm3/Nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207