MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967665923 · doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6364013

Maximizing revenue with dynamic cloud pricing: The infinite horizon case

2012· article· en· W1967665923 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingDynamic pricingRevenue managementYield managementRevenueComputer scienceMathematical optimizationTime horizonHorizonOperations researchMicroeconomicsEconomicsMathematicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the infinite horizon dynamic pricing problem for an infrastructure cloud provider in the emerging cloud computing paradigm. The cloud provider, such as Amazon, provides computing capacity in the form of virtual instances and charges customers a time-varying price for the period they use the instances. The provider's problem is then to find an optimal pricing policy, in face of stochastic demand arrivals and departures, so that the average expected revenue is maximized in the long run. We adopt a revenue management framework to tackle the problem. Optimality conditions and structural results are obtained for our stochastic formulation, which yield insights on the optimal pricing strategy. Numerical results verify our analysis and reveal additional properties of optimal pricing policies for the infinite horizon case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207