MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967673717 · doi:10.1049/iet-pel:20070051

Design, study, modelling and control of a new single-phase high power factor rectifier based on the single-ended primary inductance converter and the Sheppard–Taylor topology

2009· article· en· W1967673717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Power Electronics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower factorControl theory (sociology)Total harmonic distortionRectifier (neural networks)Topology (electrical circuits)Pulse-width modulationVoltage sourceEngineeringThree-phaseElectronic engineeringComputer scienceVoltageElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new single-phase power factor corrector (PFC) based on the Sheppard–Taylor topology is studied. Compared with conventional PFCs, this topology facilitates a better input current tracking, lower voltage stresses across the devices and larger output voltage range for the same operating area. The converter is integrated as a PFC at the DC-end of a single-phase diode bridge. Pulse-width-modulated (PWM) multi-loops control schemes are proposed and developed in order to ensure a unity power factor at the AC-source side and a regulated voltage at the DC-load side. The first control method uses the simple and robust hysteretic-based controller; the second employs a conventional PI regulator; and the third is based on the model nonlinearity compensation approach. The design of the last two control methods is based on the knowledge of a mathematical model that would accurately represent the converter. This model is developed in this paper using the state-space averaging technique, and then the small-signal transfer functions of the converter are derived for linear control design purpose. The performance of the different control strategies is evaluated through simulation experiments carried out on a numerical version of the converter. The implemented model of the converter is obtained by using the switching function technique. The control system is tested under both rated and disturbed operating conditions. The system performance is evaluated in terms of source current total harmonic distortion (THD), input power factor, DC voltage stabilization, and regulation following load variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it